Oregon doesn't just skip a transfer tax. It forbids its cities and counties from imposing one

Oregon Charges No Transfer Tax on the Deed

The prohibition is the fact worth knowing, and it is stronger than "Oregon has no transfer tax." But it is two prohibitions, not one, and they sit in different instruments.

The statute reaches local government only. ORS 306.815(1) reads: "A city, county, district or other political subdivision or municipal corporation of this state shall not impose, by ordinance or other law, a tax or fee upon the transfer of a fee estate in real property, or measured by the consideration paid or received upon transfer of a fee estate in real property." Every body named there is a creature of the state, and the Legislative Assembly is not on the list, a statute of this kind preempts subordinate governments and does not bind the body that enacted it. Local governments in Oregon are not merely declining to levy a transfer tax; they are forbidden to.

What holds the state itself is constitutional. Or. Const. art. IX, § 15 was adopted by Oregon voters as Measure 79 on 6 November 2012, and it bars a tax, fee or assessment on the transfer of "any interest in real property", a wider class than the fee estate the statute speaks of, so an interest short of full ownership is inside the constitutional bar and outside the statutory one. Its grandfather date is its own: charges operative on 31 December 2009 are preserved, which is a different clause and a different date from the statute's March 1997 line, and the two are routinely quoted as if they were one.

The constitutional provision is not among the source URLs behind this state's record, which cite the Legislature's ORS host only; we verified it against the Measure 79 ballot record instead, and we would rather say which document we read than let a citation imply a source we did not use.

There is one exception and it is a grandfather clause, not a general permission. ORS 306.815(4): "Subsection (1) of this section does not apply to any tax if the ordinance or other law imposing the tax is in effect and operative on March 31, 1997." Washington County's pre-1997 transfer tax is the one that clause preserves. If your rental sits in Washington County, that county's own assessment and taxation office is the authority on what it charges and on how it treats a conveyance to a wholly owned entity.

We are deliberately not publishing a rate for it: every county URL we tried for the transfer tax page returned a 404 and we ran out of search budget before finding the live one, and a rate we cannot check against the county's own page has no business on a page that claims every figure was verified. What we can state from the statute is the shape of the thing, one county, grandfathered, and no other Oregon jurisdiction may follow.

Two narrower carve-outs sit in the same statute and neither reaches an ordinary residential conveyance: subsection (3) exempts fees established under ORS 203.148, and subsection (5) exempts a transfer tax or fee where the recording fee charged under ORS 205.323 for the conveying instrument "is less than $107." That second one is a condition on the size of the recording fee, not a levy calculated from it, a carve-out that applies while the fee stays under a stated amount, which is a different thing from a charge keyed to the fee. With no conveyance tax there is likewise nothing in Oregon that taxes a transfer of a controlling interest in an entity that owns real property, so the sell-the-LLC question that shapes structuring in transfer-tax states does not arise here.

Oregon is the opposite of the usual case: ORS 306.815(1) forbids cities and counties from imposing a transfer tax at all. One pre-existing county ordinance is grandfathered by ORS 306.815(4), and it is the only local transfer tax in the state. Everywhere else in Oregon, there is nothing local to stack.

oregonlegislature.gov

Does the Transfer Reset Your Property Tax in Oregon?

No. Oregon limits how fast a property’s assessed value can grow, but that limit is not reset by a change of owner. The deed into your LLC does not restart the clock or lift the cap. That combination is unusual and worth knowing precisely: you get the protection of the cap without the transfer risk that normally comes with it.

Oregon caps assessed value, which usually means a state where a transfer is dangerous. It is not one, and the reason is worth understanding rather than taking on trust.

Under ORS 308.146(1), a property's maximum assessed value "equals 103 percent of the property's assessed value from the prior year or 100 percent of the property's maximum assessed value from the prior year, whichever is greater," and the property is taxed on the lesser of that maximum assessed value and its real market value. So there is a cap, and it does ratchet. The question is what releases it.

ORS 308.146(3) sets out the closed list of events that let maximum assessed value rise by more than the annual step: the property "is new property or new improvements to property"; "is partitioned or subdivided"; "is rezoned and used consistently with the rezoning"; "is first taken into account as omitted property"; or "becomes disqualified from exemption, partial exemption or special assessment." A sale is not on that list. Neither is a gift, an inheritance, or a deed from you to an LLC you own. The Department of Revenue's own taxpayer publication states the rule the same way, "MAV can increase for only two reasons: a 3 percent annual increase or specific property events", and enumerates the same five events.

That is the whole answer. Recording the deed does not reset anything, and Oregon does not have an acquisition-value system for a conveyance to escape. The one honest gap: Oregon has no general owner-occupancy homestead exemption or credit against property tax that an LLC deed could forfeit, but it does run targeted owner-conditioned programs, the disabled veteran exemption and the senior and disabled deferral among them. We did not read those statutes, so we are not asserting anything about how they treat a change of title. If your property carries one of them, ask the county assessor before you record rather than after.

Authority: ORS 308.146, oregonlegislature.gov

Moving a Property You Already Own Into the LLC in Oregon

1. 1

   Check whether the property sits in Washington County

   It's the only Oregon county with a transfer tax, preserved by the grandfather clause at ORS 306.815(4) because it was in effect and operative on 31 March 1997. Everywhere else in Oregon, ORS 306.815(1) forbids a local transfer tax outright. If the answer is Washington County, call that county's assessment and taxation office before you draft the deed and ask specifically how a conveyance to a wholly owned LLC is treated.

2. 2

   Ask your lender for written consent before recording

   This is the one cost Oregon's statutes don't eliminate. Deeding to an LLC is a transfer of title and your loan documents are a contract, not state law. Ask the servicer in writing, specifically about a conveyance to a limited liability company you own, and keep the answer with the closing file.

3. 3

   Check the assessor's records for any owner-conditioned program

   Oregon has no general homestead exemption for an LLC deed to cost you, but it does run targeted programs, the disabled veteran exemption and the senior and disabled deferral among them. We didn't read those statutes for this page. If the parcel carries one, ask the county assessor what a change of title does to it before the deed goes in.

4. 4

   Record the deed with the county

   Outside Washington County the only charge is the recording fee under ORS 205.323. There's no transfer tax return to file, no exemption to claim on the face of the instrument and no statement of value, because there's no tax those documents would support.

5. 5

   Confirm the assessment didn't move

   It shouldn't have. ORS 308.146(3) lists the only events that lift maximum assessed value above its annual step, new property or improvements, partition or subdivision, rezoning used consistently with the rezoning, omitted property, and disqualification from an exemption or special assessment, and a change of ownership isn't among them. Read the next statement against the last one anyway; it takes a minute and it's the cheapest possible check.

6. 6

   Move the city rental license and the tenant paperwork onto the LLC

   Rental registration in Oregon is municipal for ordinary dwellings, so if the city where the property sits licenses rentals, the license names an owner who is now the LLC. Leases, the notice address and the account receiving rent should follow. If the property is a manufactured dwelling park or a marina, the annual ORS 90.732 registration with the Housing and Community Services Department also has to name the new landlord.

One LLC Per Property, or One for the Portfolio?

Oregon has no series LLC statute, so separating properties means a separate LLC for each one.

Oregon's LLC act is ORS Chapter 63 and it contains no series provision of any kind. That is a cleaner negative than usual: we searched the full text of the chapter for the word "series" and found zero occurrences anywhere, not in the definitions at ORS 63.001, not in the articles of organization requirements at ORS 63.047, not in the member and transferee provisions at ORS 63.239 to 63.265, and not in any section heading. Most state LLC acts use the word somewhere, if only in class-or-series-of-interests voting language. Oregon does not use it at all. There is no protected series, no registered series and nothing to designate in an operating agreement that Oregon law will recognise.

So separating properties in Oregon means a separate LLC for each one. What makes that a different proposition here than in most states is the entry cost. In a state that taxes conveyances, splitting four rentals into four entities means four taxable deeds, and the transfer tax on the way in usually dwarfs the recurring cost of the extra entities. In Oregon the deeds are free outside Washington County (the recording fee and nothing more) and your assessments do not move. The cost of the per-property structure is therefore almost entirely recurring: the annual report, the registered agent and the bookkeeping for each entity, every year, for as long as you hold the properties.

The failure mode that follows is the mirror image of the one in transfer-tax states. Because it is cheap to add entities in Oregon, portfolios here tend to accumulate more LLCs than the owner can actually maintain, one bank account short, one annual report missed, one lease still naming the wrong entity. Separation that exists on paper and not in the books is the version of this structure that most often disappoints, and no statute fixes it.

Practically, that leaves the familiar trade-off. Separate LLCs mean separate filing fees, separate annual reports, separate registered agents and separate bank accounts, every year, for as long as you hold the properties. One LLC holding several properties means one set of costs and one pool of assets exposed to a claim arising at any of them. Which side of that you land on is a function of how much equity is in the portfolio, and it is worth pricing the recurring cost before deciding, our Oregon LLC cost breakdown has the per-entity figures.

What Creditors Can Reach, What the Oregon Statute Says

The reason to hold a rental in an LLC is usually to keep a claim arising at the property from reaching everything else you own. The reverse question matters just as much and gets far less attention: if someone wins a judgment against you personally, can they reach the rental inside the LLC? That is what a state’s charging-order provision decides.

Oregon's LLC act contains no exclusive-remedy provision.

Oregon's charging order provision is ORS 63.259, and its most important feature is what it leaves out. In full: "On application to a court of competent jurisdiction by any judgment creditor of a member, the court may charge the membership interest of the member with payment of the unsatisfied amount of the judgment with interest. To the extent so charged, the judgment creditor has only the rights of an assignee of the membership interest. This chapter shall not deprive any member of the benefit of any exemption laws applicable to the member's membership interest." Three sentences, enacted at 1993 c.173 § 52 and never amended since.

Read what is absent. The section does not use the words "exclusive remedy" or "sole remedy". It says the charging order is available, not that it is the only thing available. It does not mention foreclosure, in either direction: it neither permits it nor rules it out. And it does not use the words "single member," "sole member" or "one member," so the question of how a one-owner LLC is treated is not addressed by the statute at all. Oregon is still running the pre-Uniform-Act 1993 formulation, under which the creditor gets "only the rights of an assignee" and the section stops there.

That matters because a great deal of asset protection marketing describes exclusive-remedy language as if every state had it. Oregon's LLC act does not contain such a provision, and this page is reporting that absence rather than drawing a conclusion from it. What a creditor can actually do, and what an Oregon court would make of silence, are not things a page can tell you; they are questions for an Oregon attorney if the answer is load-bearing for your plan.

We are reporting what the section says, not what a court would do with your facts. Outcomes turn on how the LLC was capitalised, how it has been operated and what the creditor is owed, and none of that is something a page can assess. If the answer above is load-bearing for you, it is a question for a Oregon attorney.

Authority: ORS 63.259, oregonlegislature.gov

Three Problems No State Transfer Rule Solves

These land the same way in Oregon as everywhere else. One because it is federal law, two because they are contracts you signed. Which is exactly why they get left off state pages. They are also the three most likely to actually cost a landlord money, so they are here rather than buried.

The due-on-sale point is the one that generates the most bad advice. The Garn-St Germain Depository Institutions Act, at 12 U.S.C. § 1701j-3(d), bars a lender from enforcing a due-on-sale clause on nine categories of transfer of residential property of fewer than five dwelling units. The one people cite is the eighth: a transfer into an inter vivos trust in which the borrower is and remains a beneficiary and which does not relate to a transfer of rights of occupancy in the property. Neither that paragraph nor any of the other eight names a transfer to a limited liability company. The protection quoted for an LLC transfer is written for trusts, and the occupancy qualifier is the limb that matters most to a landlord, because a rental is occupied by someone else.

One honest caveat on that list. The ninth category is open-ended. It reaches any other transfer described in regulations issued under the Act, at 12 C.F.R. § 591.5(b), so it is a list that can be extended by regulation rather than a closed set fixed by the statute. We have not read those regulations end to end, and say so rather than describing the statute as more settled than we checked.

In practice lenders often do not call a loan when payments keep arriving, and that is genuinely what usually happens, but “usually not enforced” is a different thing from “not permitted,” and only one of them is a plan. The way to find out is to ask your servicer for written consent before you record, not after.

Which deed you use is a decision, not a formality. A quitclaim deed transfers whatever interest you happen to have and warrants nothing, which is why it is the cheap default for a transfer between yourself and your own company, and why title professionals warn against it. It can leave a gap in the chain of title that surfaces years later when you sell or refinance, and because it warrants nothing it gives the LLC no recourse against you if a defect turns up. A warranty deed carries the covenants across. Which one is appropriate depends on how the property was acquired and what your title history looks like, and it is a question worth asking before the deed is drafted rather than after it is recorded.

Tell your title insurer before you record. An owner’s title policy insures the person named in it. Convey the property to an LLC and the insured owner and the record owner are no longer the same. Which is the fact pattern in which coverage gets argued about at the worst possible moment, when a claim is already live. Some insurers will endorse an existing policy across to the entity, sometimes for a modest fee; some will not, and a new policy means a new premium on the current value. Either way it is a phone call before the deed rather than a discovery afterwards, and it belongs in the same budget as the tax above.

On the fourth thing people ask about: beneficial ownership reporting. Under 31 C.F.R. § 1010.380, a “reporting company” is an entity formed outside the United States and registered to do business in a State, and paragraph (c)(2)(xxiv) separately exempts any entity created by filing with a Secretary of State. A rental LLC you form in Oregon is therefore exempt and files no beneficial ownership report. Pages telling you to file within 30 days of formation are describing the rule as it stood before March 2025. The exception runs the other way: an LLC formed in another country and registered to do business in Oregon does still report. More on what compliance actually requires →

Does Oregon Make You Register the Rental?

Not for a long-term tenancy. Oregon does run a statewide registration through the Oregon Housing and Community Services Department, under ORS 90.732; ORS 90.100(16); ORS 90.736, but it is scoped to a category a conventional residential lease does not fall into. If you rent to a tenant on an ordinary lease, there is nothing to file with the state, and nothing that changes when the deed moves to the LLC. What follows sets out what the registration does cover, so you can check your own arrangement against it.

One clarification, because the answer above is narrower than it looks. Oregon's statewide registration reaches facilities, and ORS 90.100(16) defines the word tightly: "'Facility' means a manufactured dwelling park or a marina." It does not reach a rental house, a duplex or an apartment building, and ORS chapter 90 imposes no registration requirement on the landlord of an ordinary dwelling unit. If you have just deeded a single-family rental into an LLC, there is no state registration for you to update.

If you do own a park or a marina, the details are worth having. ORS 90.732(1) requires every landlord of a facility to "register annually in writing with the Housing and Community Services Department," and to "file a registration and pay a registration fee for each facility owned or managed by the landlord." The fee is tiered by the number of spaces in the facility.

The registration must give the landlord's name and business mailing address, the facility's name, physical and mailing address and telephone number, and "[t]he total number of spaces in the facility." A new facility registers "no later than 60 days after the opening of the facility" under ORS 90.732(2). Non-compliance carries a civil penalty the department may assess under ORS 90.736(1). Since the registration names the landlord, a deed that makes an LLC the owner is a change the next annual registration has to reflect.

Rental licensing of an ordinary Oregon rental, where it exists, is a city matter (Portland and other cities run their own schemes) and that is where an LLC deed usually creates a paperwork obligation.

oregonlegislature.gov

If You Rent Short-Term in Oregon

A short-term let is a different tax animal from a twelve-month tenancy, and the LLC has nothing to do with it. The lodging tax follows the stay, not the owner.

Oregon has no sales tax, so the transient lodging tax is the whole state-level story. ORS 320.305 imposes it "on any consideration charged for the sale, service or furnishing of transient lodging," measured on "the total retail price, including all charges other than taxes," and provides that "[t]he tax shall be collected by the transient lodging provider or transient lodging intermediary that collects the consideration charged for occupancy of the transient lodging." That intermediary limb is what puts the collection duty on Airbnb and VRBO rather than on you. ORS 320.300 brings whole-home rentals squarely into the base: transient lodging includes "[h]ouses, cabins, condominiums, apartment units or other dwelling units ... used for temporary human occupancy."

The rate is the item most often stated wrongly for Oregon, because it has moved twice since the tax was enacted in 2003, once up and once back down. Any figure you find on a blog is worth checking against the Department of Revenue's own lodging page, which is where the current one above comes from.

The exemptions are at ORS 320.308, and the subsection matters, because that section carries two independent thirty-day exemptions and only one of them has anything to say about platforms. Subsection (3) exempts a dwelling unit that the public uses "for fewer than 30 days per year" (a rarely-let unit, measured across the whole year) and it is that subsection, and only that subsection, that adds: "The exemption granted under this subsection does not apply to a dwelling unit that is rented out as transient lodging using a platform … provided … by a transient lodging intermediary." Subsection (6) is the one a long booking runs on. It exempts a dwelling unit "leased or otherwise occupied by the same person for a consecutive period of 30 days or more," and it contains no intermediary carve-out at all.

Nothing in it turns on how the stay was booked, and the Department states that once a stay reaches that length "the entire stay is NOT subject to state lodging tax." Reading subsection (3)'s platform sentence into subsection (6) is the error to avoid here: it produces tax on a long stay the statute exempts, on every such booking, for as long as the mistake goes uncorrected. Local transient lodging taxes are separate again (cities and counties set their own rates and administer them) so a platform collecting the state tax tells you nothing about the city's.

A platform collecting the state tax does not always cover every local tax on the same booking, and it never covers a booking taken directly. If you take reservations off-platform as well, that is where the exposure sits.

Authority: ORS 320.305; ORS 320.308; ORS 320.300, oregonlegislature.gov

Who to Ask in Oregon

For the conveyance itself, the county's recording office is the only stop outside Washington County, and the only money involved is the recording fee under ORS 205.323. If the property is in Washington County, that county's assessment and taxation office is the authority on the grandfathered transfer tax, including whether it applies to a conveyance to a wholly owned entity, which is a question the state statute doesn't answer for you.

The county assessor handles assessment questions and administers the targeted owner-conditioned programs, so if the property carries a disabled veteran exemption or a senior or disabled deferral, that office is the one to ask what a change of title does to it before you record. The Department of Revenue administers the state transient lodging tax and publishes the current rate; local transient lodging taxes are administered by the city or county that levies them, not by the Department. The Housing and Community Services Department handles facility registration under ORS 90.732, which matters only if you own a manufactured dwelling park or a marina.

Forming the LLC Itself

Nothing about the formation process changes because the LLC will hold rental property, the articles, the registered agent requirement and the annual filing are the same as for any other Oregon LLC. The walkthrough lives in the formation guide rather than being repeated here.

How to start an LLC in Oregon →

Sources